<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Newspapers, Closed Access is an Open Invitation for Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pinyadda.com/2010/01/22/for-newspapers-closed-access-is-an-open-invitation-for-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pinyadda.com/2010/01/22/for-newspapers-closed-access-is-an-open-invitation-for-failure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seth hayward</title>
		<link>http://blog.pinyadda.com/2010/01/22/for-newspapers-closed-access-is-an-open-invitation-for-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>seth hayward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pinyadda.com/?p=98#comment-79</guid>
		<description>you guys are great, seriously. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the old media industry definitely has blind spots. the NYT is one of my favorite sites (companies, even), but it&#039;s not perfect (i wouldn&#039;t pay for an account.) i subscribe to my local daily ($18/month) - the bangor daily news - and it&#039;s done great things (for a mid sized daily). but it&#039;s also just ruining itself by mismanagement of it&#039;s online properties. two headed monster indeed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the more i think about it, i think it&#039;s pinyadda (or more generally, those that embrace newer, more efficient technologies) that will win. more news, more sources, lower cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are great, seriously. </p>
<p>the old media industry definitely has blind spots. the NYT is one of my favorite sites (companies, even), but it&#39;s not perfect (i wouldn&#39;t pay for an account.) i subscribe to my local daily ($18/month) &#8211; the bangor daily news &#8211; and it&#39;s done great things (for a mid sized daily). but it&#39;s also just ruining itself by mismanagement of it&#39;s online properties. two headed monster indeed. </p>
<p>the more i think about it, i think it&#39;s pinyadda (or more generally, those that embrace newer, more efficient technologies) that will win. more news, more sources, lower cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention publishers, data, social web, social media, real-time, media -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.pinyadda.com/2010/01/22/for-newspapers-closed-access-is-an-open-invitation-for-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention publishers, data, social web, social media, real-time, media -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pinyadda.com/?p=98#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Cheryl Morris and Pinyadda, Andrew Spong. Andrew Spong said: #OA For Newspapers, Closed Access is an Open Invitation for Failure: http://url4.eu/1C6G6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Cheryl Morris and Pinyadda, Andrew Spong. Andrew Spong said: #OA For Newspapers, Closed Access is an Open Invitation for Failure: <a href="http://url4.eu/1C6G6" rel="nofollow">http://url4.eu/1C6G6</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
